Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ABRAHAM v. MCDOUGAL, et al.
as 1:2023cv00930
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ABRAHAM, SR.
Defendant:
TRAVIS MCDOUGAL, THOMAS ZOPODVA, C. A. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HORTON v. COOK et al
as 1:2019cv01275
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BRANDY COOK, ROWAN COUNTY CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT, MAGISTRATE B. FRANKLIN and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JERMAIN HORTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Cooper et al
as 2:2019cv00002
Defendant:
Seth Edwards, Spencer Merriweather, Mike Waters and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine D. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEDGEPETH V. WAGONER, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00336
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK S. HEDGEPETH
Defendant:
ANNA MILLS WAGONER and BRANDY COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hedgepeth v. Wagoner et al
as 5:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Frederick S. Hedgepeth
Defendant:
Anna Mills Wagoner and Brandy Cook
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RATIONAL SEXUAL OFFENSE LAWS, ET AL. V. STEIN, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RATIONAL SEXUAL OFFENSE LAWS , NC RSOL , JOHN DOE 1 and others
Defendant:
JOSHUA STEIN, ERIK HOOKS, ANDY WOMBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. WALKER et al
as 1:2015cv00941
Plaintiff:
MAURICE ROBINSON
Defendant:
MICHELLE WALKER and BRANDY COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. ROWAN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2015cv00838
Plaintiff:
MAURICE ROBINSON
Defendant:
ROWAN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, MICHELLE WALKER and BRANDY COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE #1 et al v. MCCRORY et al
as 1:2013cv00711
Defendant:
PAT MCCRORY, ROY A. COOPER, III, FRANK PARRISH and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE #1 , JOHN DOE #2 , JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karim v. Cabarrus County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 5:2011ct03145
Plaintiff:
Qader Sayfudin Abdul Karim
Defendant:
Cabarrus County Sheriff Dept., Brandy Cook, Alvin Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
