Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Corman Kokosing Construction Company v. Branscome, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00594
Counter Defendant:
Corman Kokosing Construction Company
Defendant:
Branscome, Inc. doing business as Branscome Concrete
Counter Claimant:
Branscome, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoffmann et al v. Posadas et al
as 5:2015cv05145
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Hoffmann and Hanover Insurance
Defendant:
Crystal A. Posadas, Allstate Insurance, Sarah Branscom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The United States of America for the use and benefit of Branscome Inc. v. The Hanover Insurance Company et al
as 2:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
The United States of America for the use and benefit of Branscome Inc.
Defendant:
The Hanover Insurance Company and Douglas P. Fleming LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Penhall Company v. Branscome, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00132
Plaintiff:
Penhall Company
Defendant:
Branscome, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Axis Surplus Insurance Company, Inc. v. City of Portsmouth et al
as 2:2011cv00399
Plaintiff:
Axis Surplus Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Portsmouth, Branscome, Inc. and Colas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The United States of America for the use and benefit of Branscome Inc., doing business as Branscome Infrastructure Group v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 4:2011cv00107
Plaintiff:
The United States of America for the use and benefit of Branscome Inc., doing business as Branscome Infrastructure Group
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Branscom v. Morgan Stanley Group Long Term Disability Plan et al
as 2:2010cv01335
Plaintiff:
Stephen G Branscom
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Group Long Term Disability Plan, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and First Unum Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
