Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BRAZELTON v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05741
Plaintiff:
JOAN BRAZELTON
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Legrand et al v. Fenstermaker et al
as 3:2012cv00743
Plaintiff:
John Legrand, Vance Baker, Eric Andrews and others
Defendant:
Erika Fenstermaker, Ryan, Poane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRAZELTON v. GOODRICH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv60002
Counter Defendant:
THE MARMON GROUP, INC., BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
ROCKBESTOS COMPANY, THEIM CORPORATION, ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS, INC. and others
Defendant:
MCNEIL & NRM INC., ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY and others
Cross Claimant:
GEORGE V. HAMILTON, INC. and ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Plaintiff:
BERNICE BRAZELTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Stephen Brazelton v. Ronnie Holt, et al
as 11-4144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN BRAZELTON
Defendant - Appellee:
RONNIE R. HOLT, Warden and ORNER
Brazelton v. Holt et al
as 4:2010cv01223
Petitioner:
Stephen Brazelton
Respondent:
Ronnie R. Holt and Orner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRAZELTON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv02227
Plaintiff:
WALTER BRAZELTON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAO v. DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2008cv03553
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ANTHONY RAO
Defendant:
DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP, DEPTFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN GILLESPIE and others
Cross Claimant:
DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP and DEPTFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cross Defendant:
JOHN GILLESPIE, TIMOTHY B. PARKS and MICHAEL BRAZELTON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RAO v. DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2008cv00370
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ANTHONY RAO
Defendant:
DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP, DEPTFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN GILLESPIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
