Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BRAZZEL v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv08268
Plaintiff:
CAROLE JEAN BRAZZEL
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRAZZELL v. ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2017cv04985
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BRAZZELL
Defendant:
ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT, ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL and PHILLY PHYC WARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brazzel v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv02192
Plaintiff:
Charita Garbo Brazzel
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRAZZELL v. LEHIGH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2014cv03767
Plaintiff:
JAMARL BRAZZELL
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PRIME CARE HEALTH PROVIDERS, NICOLE HEFFNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAZZEL v. BIOMET, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02417
Plaintiff:
JULIUS BRAZZEL
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC., BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC, BIOMET U.S. RECONSTRUCTION LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRAZZELL v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 2:2011cv00710
Plaintiff:
DONNA E. BRAZZELL
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BRAZZELL et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv60932
Plaintiff:
RANDALL W BRAZZELL, SR and LINDA G BRAZZELL
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
