Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Betty Vardin v. Magellan Health, et al
as 15-30607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BETTY J. VARDIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG COENSON, Doctor; Chief Executive Officer, RICHARD DALTON, Doctor; Cheif Medical Officer, COMPASS BEHAVIOR CENTER, also known as Compass and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BRENDA JOHNSON, CEO, CNP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Vardin v. Magellan et al
as 2:2014cv02729
Plaintiff:
Betty J. Vardin
Defendant:
Magellan Health, Terrebonne Parish, Iberia Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Johnson v. New York City et al et al
as 1:2014cv04278
Defendant:
PO Reinaldo Alvarez, Police Officers John Does #1-8, Judge Elise Koenderman and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Johnson et al v. Barr et al
as 1:2014cv02540
Defendant:
P.O. "John Does", Detective Rebecca H. Asman, Detective Jason Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Johnson and Stephen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
