Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Brenda ParkerIn re: Brenda Parker
as 22-1873
Petitioner: In re: BRENDA PARKER
Respondent: AGENT MANAGER JOHN FELTON, AGENT MANAGER MICHAEL ROTH, AGENT MANAGER STEPHANIE BURNS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00610
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01678
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00597
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
PARKER v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv14726
Defendant: MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and others
Plaintiff: BRENDA PARKER
In Re: PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brenda Parker v. Jane Magnus-Stinson
as 19-1255
Petitioner: BRENDA PARKER
Respondent: JANE MAGNUS-STINSON
Brenda Parker v. James Morrissey, et al
as 18-2249
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRENDA PARKER
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES JOSEPH MORRISSEY, ANNA-KATRINA S. CHRISTAKIS and JOHN DOES, Mangers and Officers
Brenda Parker v. Tanya Pratt
as 18-2193
Petitioner: BRENDA PARKER
Respondent: TANYA WALTON PRATT
PARKER v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv07056
Plaintiff: BRENDA PARKER
Defendant: ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKER v. CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00660
Defendant: CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, CAPITAL ONE, NA, ANNA-KATRINA SARANTI CHRISTAKIS and others
Plaintiff: BRENDA PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?