Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Williams et al v. O'Brien at al
as 1:2024cv11161
Plaintiff:
Charles P Williams and Valencia Williams
Defendant:
Paul O'Brien, Town of Hanson, Michael Miksch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Renaud et al
as 1:2024cv10165
Plaintiff:
Devon Sanders
Defendant:
Cheryl A. Renaud, Krystle Brown, Amy Boncher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliveira v. Moore et al
as 1:2023cv30024
Plaintiff:
Timothy Oliveira
Defendant:
James Moore, Michael Montagne, Daniel Soroka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151 Labor: Review of Agency Action
Arbogast v. Pfizer et al
as 1:2022cv10156
Plaintiff:
Brent A. Arbogast and Pro se Litigant Brent A. Arbogast
Defendant:
Pfizer, Sheehan, Phinney, Bass & Green, P.A., John J. Brack and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Harding v. Gross Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2021cv11630
Plaintiff:
Brent Harding
Defendant:
Gross Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
S. et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2021mc91545
Plaintiff:
Brent S., Angie S., J. B. and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts HMO Blue
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10782
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Mogg-Brandon et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2017cv12012
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Claudine Mogg-Brandon and Brent Brandon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Padmanabhan, MD PhD v. Hulka et al
as 1:2017cv11939
Plaintiff:
Bharanidharan Padmanabhan, MD PhD
Defendant:
Carol Hulka, M.D., Rachel Nardin, M.D., James Paikos and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
