Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
MILLER et al v. HENSLEY et al
as 2:2022cv03511
Plaintiff:
Brian James Miller and Timothy Wylie
Defendant:
Charles Hensley, Danielle Baldwin, Sergeant Manner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KASPEROWICZ v. PINE-RICHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2021cv01097
Plaintiff:
ERIC KASPEROWICZ
Defendant:
PINE-RICHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT, BRIAN R. MILLER, PETER LYONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. RENEW FORESTRY GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00081
Defendant:
RENEW DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLLP, RENEW HOLDINGS, LLC, BRIAN A. MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
McLaughlin v. Zavada et al
as 1:2019cv00474
Defendant:
Angela Zimmerlink, Lt. Smith, Lt. Miller and others
Plaintiff:
William McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. FAYETTE COUNTY et al
as 2:2015cv01590
Plaintiff:
BRIAN S. MILLER
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY , VINCE ZAPOTOSKY , ANGELA M. ZIMMERLINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEIDEL v. BENNETT et al
as 2:2015cv00023
Plaintiff:
KYLE SEIDEL
Defendant:
CHRIS BENNETT, LANKEY, TOM HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SEIDEL v. MILLER et al
as 2:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
KYLE PAUL SEIDEL
Defendant:
BRIAN S. MILLER, MICHAEL J. ZAVADA, BARRY A. CROFTCHECK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADLEY v. MILLER et al
as 2:2014cv01698
Plaintiff:
YVONNE ICAN BRADLEY
Defendant:
BRIAN S. MILLER, MICHAEL J. ZAVADA, AL AMBROSINI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
