Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Barnes, et al v. City of Oklahoma City, et al
as 22-6171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TABATHA BARNES, REGINA COPELAND, SHANDAYREON HILL and others
Plaintiff:
SYRITA BOWEN
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, DANIEL HOLTZCLAW, BILL CITTY and others
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES
Smock v. Johnson et al
as 3:2020cv01339
Defendant:
Randy Nyberg, Whipper Johnson, Lowell Tison and others
Plaintiff:
Lenard Alfred Smock, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Grate v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2016cv00412
Plaintiff:
Rosetta Grate
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of, Daniel Holtzclaw, Bill Citty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Holtzclaw et al
as 5:2016cv00349
Plaintiff:
Adaira Gardner
Defendant:
Daniel Holtzclaw, Bill Citty , Brian Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Barnes et al v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2016cv00184
Plaintiff:
Tabatha Barnes , Terri Morris , Syrita Bowen and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of , Daniel Holtzclaw, Bill Citty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baum v. Academy, LTD et al
as 3:2014cv00006
Defendant:
Academy, LTD, Baton Rouge Police Department, Brian Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Price Baum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Collins et al v. Ostrowski
as 2:2010cv02095
Plaintiff:
Dustin Collins , Lawrence Moye , Debra Blanchard and others
Defendant:
Thomas Ostrowski
Petitioner:
Ernesto Perez and Deborah Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
