Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Amarat et al v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2023cv40065
Plaintiff:
javier Amarat, Veronica Euga, Christopher Euga and others
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Edward M. Augustus, Jr., Steven W. Sargent and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Agyeah v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2021cv40020
Defendant:
Edward M. Augustus, Jr., Michael W. McGrath, Michael F. Ryder and others
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Agyeah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Radfar v. Covino et al
as 1:2020cv10178
Defendant:
City of Revere, Joseph I Covino, Brian M Arrigo and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon Radfar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calin v. Davin et al
as 1:2017cv10349
Defendant:
Michael R. Davin, Brian M Barefoot, Ettore V. Biagioni and others
Plaintiff:
Edgar Calin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
THE VLADIMIR GUSINSKY REV. TRUST v. Cynosure, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv10338
Plaintiff:
THE VLADIMIR GUSINSKY REV. TRUST
Defendant:
Cynosure, Inc., Michael R. Davin, William O. Flannery and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Joel Rosenfeld IRA v. Cynosure, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv10309
Plaintiff:
Joel Rosenfeld IRA
Defendant:
Cynosure, Inc., Michael R. Davin, William O. Flannery and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Fernandes v. Landrum et al
as 1:2016cv10816
Plaintiff:
William M. Fernandes
Defendant:
Timothy J. Landrum , Briane M. Grey , William M. Czopek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Northern Bank & Trust Company v. Galvin
as 1:2016cv10228
Plaintiff:
Northern Bank & Trust Company
Defendant:
Brian M. Galvin
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1725
Carlson v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv30021
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Carlson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Moseley v. Spencer et al
as 1:2015cv13661
Plaintiff:
William B Moseley, II
Defendant:
Luis S. Spencer, Bruce Gelb, Lynn Cherneski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
