Cases 1 - 10 of 19
BUTLER v. MATHIS et al
as 5:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
CURTIS BUTLER
Defendant:
BRIAN MATHIS, LLOYD WILLIAMS and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2019cv00479
Plaintiff:
Jason Brian Mathis
Defendant:
M Escobar, Pima, County of and Pima County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arizona, State of v. $1,657.00 in US Currency et al
as 4:2019cv00102
Defendant:
$1,657.00 in US Currency
Claimant:
Jason Brian Mathis
Plaintiff:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mathis v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2019cv00062
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Unknown Babuta, Unknown Kerns and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Brian Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Valdivia et al
as 4:2019cv00056
Defendant:
Unknown Valenzuela, Jennifer Kelley, Quick Bail Bonds and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Brian Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2019cv00054
Defendant:
Unknown Whittaker, Florida Department of Corrections, Unknown Bird and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Brian Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2019cv00042
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Daniel South, Christopher Browning and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Brian Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2019cv00038
Defendant:
Shane Barrett, Tucson Police Department, Tucson, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Brian Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. Directory Distributing Associates, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00122
Plaintiff:
Eric Allen, Donald Walker, Ervin Walker and others
Defendant:
Sandy Sanders, Laura Washington, Roland E. Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mathis v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2019cv00039
Plaintiff:
Jason Brian Mathis
Defendant:
Edward Harper, Tucson, City of, Pima, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
