Cases 1 - 10 of 14
PHELPS v. NEWMAN
as 1:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
BRIAN PHELPS
Respondent:
A. NEWMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
USA v. Brian Phelps
as 23-2331
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIAN PHELPS, a/k/a B-Money, a/k/a B
Kathy Phelps, et al v. Delphi Behavioral Health Group, LLC
as 23-10476
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHY PHELPS, BRIAN PHELPS and TAVARES CRENSHAW
Defendant / Appellee:
DELPHI BEHAVIORAL HEALTH GROUP, LLC
PHELPS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19930
Plaintiff:
BRIAN PHELPS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PHELPS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv00986
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHELPS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv15420
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phelps et al v. Delphi Behavioral Health Group, LLC
as 0:2019cv61554
Plaintiff:
Tavares Crenshaw and Brian Phelps
Defendant:
Delphi Behavioral Health Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phelps et al v. Delphi Behavioral Health Group, LLC
as 0:2019cv61557
Plaintiff:
Tavares Crenshaw and Brian Phelps
Defendant:
Delphi Behavioral Health Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHELPS v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv04601
Defendant:
TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN PHELPS
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. Phelps
as 1:2019cv00011
Defendant:
Brian Phelps
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
