Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mowbray v. Wimer et al
as 7:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Trenton Brice Mowbray
Defendant:
Captain Jimmy Wimer, Lieutenant Cory Madison and Lieutenant Willburger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brice v. The C.F. Sauer Brands, Inc. et al.
as 3:2023cv00403
Plaintiff:
William E Brice and William E. Brice, Sr.
Defendant:
The C.F. Sauer Brands, Inc. and Falfurrias Capital Partners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Drayton v. Lee et al
as 1:2022cv00892
Plaintiff:
Michael Louis Drayton
Defendant:
Manuel Lee, Brice Gentry and Lago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKoy et al v. Lankford et al
as 1:2022cv00604
Plaintiff:
Peter Brice McKoy, Jr. and John C. West, Jr., LLC
Defendant:
Thomas Lankford and Lankford & Reed, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Stanley v. Lambert et al
as 3:2021cv00310
Defendant:
Andrew Kolp, Brice Lambert and Marie Bristow
Plaintiff:
Norris Edward Stanley, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brice, II v. Cherry et al
as 2:2021cv00211
Defendant:
Dexter Earl Cherry, XPO Logistics Drayage, LLC and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Dennis Maurice Brice, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00732
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Gibbs et al v. Elevate Credit, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00632
Plaintiff:
Darlene Gibbs, Patrick Inscho, Jeri Brennan and others
Defendant:
Elevate Credit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Brice v. Ormond
as 1:2018cv00960
Petitioner:
Jaron Brice
Respondent:
J. Ray Ormond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
