Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Simply Bright Ideas, Inc. v. Everlast Lighting, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
Simply Bright Ideas, Inc.
Defendant:
Everlast Lighting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mao v. Bright
as 3:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
JU MAO
Defendant:
FOREST MITCHELL BRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Van Vallis-Bright v. Scripps Media Inc.
as 2:2022cv10227
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Van Vallis-Bright
Defendant:
Scripps Media Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simply Bright Ideas, Inc. v. Worth Investment Group, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv11718
Defendant:
Worth Capital, LLC, Worth Investment Group, LLC, Worth Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Simply Bright Ideas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bright et al v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00374
Defendant:
Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. and Brooksdale Senior Solutions
Plaintiff:
Meghan Bright, Gary Weir and Jean Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans, et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., et al
as 2:2018cv02506
Defendant:
Norma Cruz, Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. and Brittney Bright
Plaintiff:
Audrey J. Evans and Ronald C. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bright v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00283
Plaintiff:
Fletcher Bright
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Motolease LLC v. RJ Power Sports, Inc. d/b/a Bright Power Sports
as 2:2017cv13192
Plaintiff:
Motolease LLC
Defendant:
RJ Power Sports, Inc. d/b/a Bright Power Sports
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Bright v. Liberty Mutual et al (TV1)
as 4:2017cv00047
Plaintiff:
Edna Bright
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual and Veronda M. RuBright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bright v. Liberty Mutual et al
as 3:2017cv01235
Plaintiff:
Edna Bright
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual and Veronda M. RuBright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
