Cases 1 - 10 of 202
McCoy v. Womack
as 24-40261
Plaintiff:
James McCoy
Defendant:
Jacquelyn Womack, Senior Practice Manager/Med Complaint, V. Briones, Administrative Associate/Practice Manager and Tara Owens, Registered Nurse Mid-Level Provider
Briones v. Lumpkin
as 24-10348
Petitioner:
Jose Nieves Briones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Briones v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00137
Petitioner:
Cristina Kaye Briones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Briones v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Richi Briones
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean, Warden and Chaplain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosas v. Cardella et al
as 3:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Raymond Paul Rosas
Defendant:
Cardella, Henley, Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briones v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv00790
Petitioner:
Wofford Briones and Briones Wofford
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wofford v. State of Georgia
as 4:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Briones Wofford
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Brion B Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00145
Petitioner:
Brion B Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Briones v. Avrom et al
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Richi Briones
Defendant:
Avrom, Jeremy Bean and HDSP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
