Cases 1 - 10 of 144
Britt-Johnson v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Patricia Britt-Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Treece v. Truitt et al
as 5:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Warren Britt Treece
Defendant:
Catherine Truitt, Andrew Houlihan, Terry Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Treece v. Hucks
as 5:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Warren Britt Treece
Defendant:
Erin Hucks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Treece v. Kinsley et al
as 5:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Warren Britt Treece
Defendant:
Kody Kinsley and Vaughn S. Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Whitehead v. Medical Staff et al
as 5:2023ct03315
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Whitehead
Defendant:
Medical Staff, Sheriff Hans Miller, Lt. Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amos et al v. NAPA Management Services Corporation
as 7:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Barry D Amos, Luis Arce, Andrew Barton and others
Defendant:
NAPA Management Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BROWN v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL L. BROWN, JR.
Defendant:
TODD ISHEE, EDDIE BUFFALO, Sgt. A. ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03193
Plaintiff:
Marshall L. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Eddie Buffalo, Sgt. A. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. GERNEGEN et al
as 1:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. BALRUS PERRIGAN GERNEGEN, MARCUS SCOTT, CAPTAIN MR. INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Britt v. Kijakazi
as 7:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
TAMMY LYNN BRITT
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
