Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01646
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00295
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Davis v. Godfrey et al
as 2:2023cv00101
Plaintiff: Vincent Edward Davis
Defendant: Tammie Godfrey, Gina Childress and I Ripon Britton, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Britton v. Davis et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00321
Plaintiff: Fernandez Britton, Jr.
Defendant: Lt. Davis and Officer Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blom et al v. City of Gadsden Alabama
as 4:2022cv00582
Plaintiff: Matthew R Blom, Austin T Abernathy, Joseph C Bailey and others
Defendant: City of Gadsden Alabama
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Dees v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00930
Plaintiff: Britton Taylor Dees
Defendant: BP Exploration & Production Inc and BP America Production Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 in
Britton v. Allen
as 7:2017cv01573
Plaintiff: Marcellus Ke'Andre D Britton
Defendant: Carl E Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britton v. M&C Renovations Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00717
Plaintiff: Jason Britton
Defendant: M&C Renovations Inc, James M Henderson and Christopher Toenes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Britton v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00194
Plaintiff: Mandy Marie Britton
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00622
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?