Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
United States of America v. Adekoya
as 26-795
Defendant:
DAVID DANIYAN, OLUWASEUN ADEKOYA, JERMON BROOKS and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Adekoya (Bassie)
as 25-3153
Defendant:
OLUWASEUN ADEKOYA, DAVID DANIYAN, JERMON BROOKS and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Adekoya
as 25-3073
Defendant:
DAVID DANIYAN, OLUWASEUN ADEKOYA, JERMON BROOKS and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Adekoya (Balogun)
as 25-2590
Defendant:
DAVID DANIYAN, JERMON BROOKS, CHRISTIAN QUIVERS and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CARRIGAN-BRODA v PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2025cv00282
Plaintiff:
ISABELLE CARRIGAN-BRODA
Defendant:
PFIZER INC and PHARMACIA & UPJOHN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carrigan-Broda v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv00251
Plaintiff:
Isabelle Carrigan-Broda
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc., Viatris, Inc., Greenstone, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARRIGAN-BRODA v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2025cv00168
Plaintiff:
ISABELLE CARRIGAN-BRODA
Defendant:
GREENSTONE LLC, PRASCO LABS, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Swinea v. Peters et al
as 1:2024cv01517
Defendant:
Honorable Elizabeth Walsh, Robert Fitzpatrick, Joseph Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Swinea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolliver (PS) v. District Court Arapaho County et al
as 1:2024cv01261
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
District Court Arapaho County, United States District Court, Kylie Jenner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
