Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Aubin v. Brooks Range Contract Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10753
Plaintiff:
Michael Aubin
Defendant:
Brooks Range Contract Services, Inc. and Paragon Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Smith v Brooks Range Contract Services, Inc.
as 1:2018cv10851
Defendant:
Brooks Range Contract Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 877, AFL-CIO v. Brooks Range Contracting Services, Inc.
as 1:2017cv10431
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 877, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
Brooks Range Contracting Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-4289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Local 94-94A-94B, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO v. Brooks Range Contract Services, Inc.
as 1:2014cv04041
Respondent:
Brooks Range Contract Services, Inc.
Petitioner:
Local 94-94A-94B, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
FANNING v. BROOKS RANGE CONTRACT SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2013cv01262
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
BROOKS RANGE CONTRACT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Moore v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jerridene Moore
Defendant:
United States of America and Brooks Range Contract Services, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
