Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Johnston et al v. Strategic Equipment, LLC
as 1:2022cv00676
Counter Defendant:
Ronald Johnston and Manning Brothers Food Equipment Co., Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Strategic Equipment, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Cangelosi v. Brothers Food Mart et al
as 2:2020cv02062
Plaintiff:
Clayton Cangelosi
Defendant:
Brothers Food Mart, Mad Faiez Hamdan and Imad Faiez Hamdan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Sream, Inc. v. Tiger Brothers Food Mart, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00657
Plaintiff:
Sream, Inc.
Defendant:
Tiger Brothers Food Mart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Garner et al v. Door & Window Guard Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv10553
Defendant:
Althea Kuller, PC Development Inc, Luis Vera and others
Plaintiff:
James Garner and Tina Turner
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
HAMDAN et al
as 3:2015cv00411
Plaintiff:
IMAD FAIEZ HAMDAN and TIGER BROTHERS FOOD MART INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Hamdan v. Tiger Brothers Food Mart Inc.
as 3:2015cv00412
Plaintiff:
Imad Faiez Hamdan
Defendant:
Tiger Brothers Food Mart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Mohammad et al v. Retailer Operations Division et al
as 2:2015cv00394
Plaintiff:
Nael Mohammad and Brothers Foods Inc
Defendant:
Retailer Operations Division and Douglas G Perry
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 2305
Ahmed v. Brothers Food Mart et al
as 2:2013cv05948
Plaintiff:
Yusif Ahmed
Defendant:
Brothers Food Mart and Imad Faiez Hamdan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv23458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
