Cases 1 - 10 of 11
James Lee Ballard v. John Lyon Broling, et al
as 22-12651
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LEE BALLARD
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN LYON BROLING, Assistant Regional Counselor, CANDACE KAYE BROWER, Regional Counselor and DAVID KREIDER, Alachua County Judge
BALLARD v. BROLING et al
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE BALLARD
Defendant:
JOHN LYON BROLING, CANDACE KAYE BROWER and DAVID KREIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Bulloch County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mark Hall
Defendant:
Bulloch County Jail, Sheriff Anderson, Officer Mike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mark Hall
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, J. Kevin Perry, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAXWELL v. HIGGINS et al
as 4:2020cv00463
Defendant:
JEFFERY E LEWIS, CANDICE K BROWER and BRIAN A HIGGINS
Plaintiff:
DANIEL K MAXWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Jones v. Douglas, et al
as 18-11611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL LIONEL JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS, Mental Health Counselor, KNOWLINGER, MH Dr. Individual and Official Capacity, FRISON, MH Counselor and others
Sutton v. Bentley et al
as 5:2016cv01812
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutton
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, Jefferson Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Brower
as 6:2008cv00083
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mark Hall
Defendant:
Jay Brower
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brower v. Department of Corrections
as 0:2008cv60333
Petitioner:
William Scott Brower
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brower v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2008cv60333
Petitioner:
William Scott Brower
Respondent:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
