Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Thomas v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Bruce Dewayne Thomas, III
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Christina Reagle, Jacqueline Mayes and others
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Bruce D. Thomas
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv01243
Plaintiff:
Bruce Anthony Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Thomas v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2021pq01670
Plaintiff:
Bruce Edward Thomas
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00384
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00580
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Bruce A. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv02825
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Bruce Earl Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id
Bruce Renard Thomas et al v. Rod Danielson
as 5:2018cv00366
Appellee:
Rod Danielson
Appellant:
Bruce Renard Thomas
In Re Debtor:
Bruce Renard Thomas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
