Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Simpson et al v. Navajo Express, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv03779
Plaintiff:
Ryan Simpson and Casey Simpson
Defendant:
Navajo Express, Inc. and Bruce Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Nathan Smith v. State of Texas, et al
as 13-20263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DICK SCHWARTZ, Esquire (personal and individual capacity), LAW OFFICE OF SCHWARTZ JUNNELL GREENBERG AND OATOUT, ESQUIRE, RON WALKER, Esquire (personal and individual capacity) and others
Nathan Smith v. State of Texas, et al
as 12-20819
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, LAW OFFICE OF SCHWARTZ JUNNELL GREENBERG AND OATOUT ESQ, DICK SCHWARTZ, Esquire (personal and individual capacity) and others
Nathan Smith v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2012cv00469
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Dick Schwartz , Law office of Schwartz Junnell Greenberg and Oatout Esq and others
Counter_claimant:
Law office of Schwartz Junnell Greenberg and Oatout Esq
Counter_defendant:
Nathan Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barze v. Bennett et al
as 2:2008cv05152
Plaintiff:
Darrell D Barze
Defendant:
Bruce Bennett and Jeff Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barze v. Bennett et al
as 3:2008cv00759
Plaintiff:
Darrell O. Barze
Defendant:
Bruce Bennett and Jeff Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hughes v. Ponchatoula City et al
as 2:2008cv04343
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hughes
Defendant:
Ponchatoula City, Ponchatoula Police Department, Bryan Manino and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Collins v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2008cv00887
Plaintiff:
Claude D. Collins
Defendant:
Louisiana State, Bruce Bennett, Randy Pinion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Bennett et al
as 2:2007cv01276
Plaintiff:
Howard P. Knight
Defendant:
Bruce Bennett, Jeff Johnson and Louisiana State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
