Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bruce Haney v. L. Lundy
as 2:2024cv03159
Petitioner:
Bruce Haney
Respondent:
L. Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PS)LeBus et al v. The County of Trinity et al
as 2:2018cv02720
Defendant:
Leslie Hubbard, Mike McHugh, Terry Mines and others
Plaintiff:
Naomi Marie LeBus and Thomas J. Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PC) McColm v. Trinity County, et al.
as 2:2014cv00773
Defendant:
Michael Hubbard, Laurie Willis, Trinity County Board of Supervisors and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. McColm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gund et al v. County of Trinity et al
as 2:2013at00236
Plaintiff:
James Gund and Norma Gund
Defendant:
County of Trinity , Ron Whitman and Bruce Haney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gund et al v. County of Trinity et al
as 2:2013cv00452
Plaintiff:
James Gund and Norma Gund
Defendant:
County of Trinity, Ron Whitman and Bruce Haney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Potts v. County of Trinity, et al
as 2:2012cv01793
Plaintiff:
Mark Potts
Defendant:
County of Trinity , Trinity County Sheriff's Office and Bruce Haney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POTTS v. Trinity County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2012at00942
Plaintiff:
MARK POTTS
Defendant:
Trinity County Sheriff's Office, Bruce Haney and County of Trinity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Trinity County Jail and Medical Procedures et al
as 2:2012cv00283
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Scott Mays
Defendant:
Trinity County Jail and Medical Procedures, Peter Braga, Bruce Haney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spohn v. Mucklow et al
as 2:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
Paul Noah Spohn
Defendant:
Max Mucklow, Doug Craig, Crystal Whitcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haney v. Epstein et al
as 1:2010cv01506
Defendant:
L. Epstein , J Gonzales , M Jennings and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bruce Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
