Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Beaufort County, North Carolina et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07172
Plaintiff:
Beaufort County, North Carolina, Bertie County, North Carolina, Bladen County, North Carolina and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Beaufort County, North Carolina et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Beaufort County, North Carolina, Bertie County, North Carolina, Bladen County, North Carolina and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1713 WATERFORD POINTE ROAD, LEXINGTON, DAVIDSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
1713 WATERFORD POINTE ROAD, LEXINGTON, DAVIDSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON, 2100 WATERFORD POINTE ROAD, LEXINGTON, DAVIDSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON, 2084 WATERFORD POINTE ROAD, LEXINGTON, DAVIDSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture - Gambling, etc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00066
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-2018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2007cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
