Cases 21 - 30 of 950
Bonner v. Collier et al
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charles Bonner
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Texas Parole Board and Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Massey v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Ross Massey
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reedy v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00069
Petitioner:
Charles Reedy
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Syed v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Mohsin M Syed
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mohsin Syed v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Mohsin M Syed
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mohsin Syed v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Mohsin M Syed
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cavett v. Collier
as 6:2024cv00075
Petitioner:
Bryan Scott Cavett
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bailey v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Marcus Bailey
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Donald Trump, Ms. FNU Harmon/Washburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Collier
as 3:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
Bobby Gonzales
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Fort Bend County et al
as 4:2023cv04836
Plaintiff:
Darren Tranell Hughes
Defendant:
Fort Bend County, Fort Bend County Sheriff's Office, David M. Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
