Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meraz v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jerome Meraz
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Chistopher Budnick, Toni Shockey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Darmartress Collins
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Chistopher Budnick, Toni Shockey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doering v. Payne et al
as 2:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Alan Doering
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, M D Reed, Budnick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teconchuk v. Budnick et al
as 4:2021cv01220
Plaintiff:
Mitchell D Teconchuk
Defendant:
Christipher Budnick, Antwon Emsweller, Lajoya S Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bottorff v. Dominicis et al
as 4:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones, Wellpath LLC and Victor Sean Bottorff
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Dominicis et al
as 4:2021cv00731
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Dominicis et al
as 3:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones and Wellpath LLC
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ottis v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv00052
Plaintiff:
Devling Ottis
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Christopher Budnick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv00051
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Christopher Budnick and others
Plaintiff:
Jakobe Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
