Cases 1 - 10 of 233
Torres v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division, Jeffery S. McGhee, Robert Brett Bullis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huff v. Bullis et al
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Peter D. Huff
Defendant:
Brian Bullis, John Doe, FNU Biggerstaff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huff v. Hicks et al
as 1:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Peter Huff and Peter D. Huff
Defendant:
FNU Hicks, FNU Bullis, FNU Biggerstaff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INGRAM v. BULLIS
as 1:2023cv00958
Petitioner:
ERIC ANTRON INGRAM
Respondent:
BRET BULLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BULLY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv23870
Plaintiff:
RYAN BULLY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Friday v. Carver et al
as 1:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Tevin Damato Friday
Defendant:
Ben Carver, FNU Cothran, Caroline Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bullie v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03074
Plaintiff:
Tamara Bullie
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BULLIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv01273
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CHRISTOPHER BULLIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ingram v. Bullis
as 3:2023cv00416
Petitioner:
Eric Antron Ingram
Respondent:
Bret Bullis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BULLIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv17128
Plaintiff:
BRANDON BULLIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
