Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Moore v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections and The Bureau of Criminal Apprehensions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Attorney General for the State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2022cv02799
Plaintiff:
Jose Montrell Hudson
Defendant:
Attorney General for the State of Minnesota, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hudson v. Attorney General for the State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2022cv01997
Plaintiff:
Jose Montrell Hudson
Defendant:
Attorney General for the State of Minnesota, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, The and Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Corrections, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson et al v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2020cv02415
Defendant:
Officer Nathan Sandberg, Agent Christopher Olson, Agent Michelle Frascone and others
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Johnson and C. Taren Vang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Theyson v. Kaneko et al
as 0:2014cv00186
Plaintiff:
Todd Anthony Theyson
Defendant:
Michael Masamitsu Kaneko and Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv00640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Larson et al v. Minnesota Commission of Corrections et al
as 0:2010cv04288
Plaintiff:
Kevin Herman Larson, James Leonard Blackburn and James Aloysious Wieseler
Defendant:
Minnesota Commission of Corrections, Joan Fabian, Lori Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2009cv01822
Plaintiff:
William C. Davis
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and Joan Fabian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
