Cases 71 - 80 of 111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1274
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10236
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bhatty v. Hassell et al
as 4:2008cv02390
Petitioner:
Shariq Abbas Bhatty
Respondent:
Scott Hassell, Michael B Mukasey, Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Erich Scherfen, et al v. Department of Homeland Securit, et al
as 08-4774
Petitioner:
ERICH SCHERFEN and RUBINA TAREEN
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Bhatty v. Hassell et al
as 4:2008cv02215
Plaintiff:
Shariq A. Bhatty
Defendant:
Scott Hassell, Michael B Mukasey, Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lopez-Gomez v. Atty Gen USA
as 08-4182
Not Party - Petitioner:
CARLOS RODOLFO LOPEZ-GOMEZ
Not Party - Respondent:
ATTY GEN USA, ACTING DIST DIR US DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv01344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Damion Wilks v. Department of Homeland Securit, et al
as 08-3352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMION A.D. WILKS
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and THOMAS DURAN
Not Party - Amicus Appellant:
ASIAN LAW CAUCUS, COMM JUSTICE PROJECT, CORNELL ASYLUM CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE APPELLATE LAW CLINIC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
