Cases 11 - 20 of 118
Barboza v. United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2020cv11137
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Jerome Barboza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hulsey v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv11078
Defendant:
Federal Medical Center Fort Devens and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Olin Dale Hulsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Violette v. Spaulding et al
as 4:2020cv40050
Defendant:
Radm S. Spaulding, Federal Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paul Violette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Violette v Fandryer, et al
as 4:2020cv40049
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Dr. Fandryer and U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paul Violette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santaniello v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2020cv30027
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Ralph Santaniello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Borden v. Sexton et al
as 1:2019cv12306
Defendant:
Sexton, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Dean Borden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Almeda v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2019cv12275
Defendant:
Dr. Sharig Ahmad, Warden S. Spaulding, Kevin Elker and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Almeda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Kavanaugh
as 1:2019cv11510
Defendant:
Mr Kavanaugh, Ms Laver and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Carlos Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Gleason et al
as 1:2019cv11351
Defendant:
Gleanson, Federal Bureau of Prisons and David Ward
Plaintiff:
Carlos Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Gleason et al
as 1:2019cv11238
Defendant:
Gleanson, David Ward, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
