Cases 21 - 30 of 3,640
Gardner v. Cain
as 3:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
James Mortez Gardner
Respondent:
Commissioner Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weems v. SWVRJA-Duffield Jail
as 7:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Burl Lynn Weems
Defendant:
SWVRJA-Duffield Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brent v. Cain
as 24-60044
Petitioner:
James Lee Brent
Respondent:
Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
Wilson v. Cain et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Anthony Deundra Wilson
Defendant:
Commisioner Burl Cain, MTC - Management & Training Corporation, East Mississippi Correctional Facility Administration and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. MacDonald et al
as 4:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Charles Jordan
Defendant:
Tracy MacDonald, Sequcia Wren, Marcus McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. U S America
as 3:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Bernard Mathis
Respondent:
U S America and MDOC Commissioner Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jarvis v. Cain et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus L. Jarvis
Defendant:
Nathaniel Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Isby v. Cain
as 24-60003
Petitioner:
Anthony Isby
Respondent:
Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
Washington v. Cain et al
as 1:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Catina Washington
Defendant:
Burl Cain, John Hunt, Jeworski Mallett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Cain
as 1:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
James D. Brown
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
