Cases 1 - 10 of 1,422
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-1101
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
MICHELLE BIELA, SANTORO, HENRY MUSHI and others
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
STEDMAN, Nurse, KATHRYN CARHART, Nurse, RALPH, Nurse and others
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff:
Skylar Salem
Defendant:
William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Burn One LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01031
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Burn One LLC t/a Burn One Cigar & Jazz Lounge t/a Burn One Cigar Lounge and Carlton Woods
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Tung et al v. Blinken et al
as 1:2024cv02590
Plaintiff:
Crystal Tung and Jiayou Luo
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. BURNS
as 1:2024cv00838
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
Stephen Scott Burns
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Andrikos, et al. v. Pacific Maritime Association, et al.
as 24-1554
Plaintiff:
EVAGELOS ANDRIKOS, BRYANT BURNS, MICHAEL OLVERA and others
Appellant:
ANTHONY WHEELER
Defendant:
PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION, APM TERMINALS PACIFIC LLC, APS STEVEDORING, LLC and others
Jane Doe v. East Stroudsburg University of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-8009
Respondent:
JANE DOE and VICTOR JASEI SAMU BURNS, Resident Advisor
Petitioner:
EAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, DR. MARCIA G. WELSH, University President, MARIA Z. CUTSINGER, DIRECTOR OF STUDENT CONDUCT AND COMMUNITY STANDARDS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
