Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Mcravin v. Burns
as 5:2017mc00028
Plaintiff: Luisus E. Mcravin, IV
Defendant: Antwan L. Burns
MOHAMMAD v. BURNS
as 1:2017cv00602
Plaintiff: BASIR RAZZAK MOHAMMAD
Defendant: BURNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. McKoy
as 5:2017hc02019
Petitioner: Thurman Burns
Respondent: Timothy McKoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00666
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BURNS v. DANIELS
as 1:2016cv01017
Petitioner: JOHN LEE BURNS
Respondent: FAYE DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. HIGH ROCK RESTAURANT VENTURES, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00209
Plaintiff: BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. , STONE DIAMOND MUSIC CORP. , SONY/ATV SONGS LLC and others
Defendant: HIGH ROCK RESTAURANT VENTURES, INC., JACK T. PHILLIPS and TRADD BURN
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
FERGUSON v. BOWMAN et al
as 1:2015cv01007
Plaintiff: JOSEPH STANTON FERGUSON
Defendant: BOWMAN, ALLEN, WOODS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
600 Creekside LLC v. Scottsdale Insurance Company, et al
as 4:2015cv00179
Plaintiff: 600 Creekside LLC
Defendant: Scottsdale Insurance Company, Nationwide Corporation, Burns & Wilcox Reinsurance, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Type: Contract Insurance
ARNOLD v. ELIASON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00498
Plaintiff: TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant: RUSSELL A. ELIASON, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, COMBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARNOLD v. COMBS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00499
Plaintiff: TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant: COMBS, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, RUSSELL A. ELIASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?