Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Jarrett et al v. Dave and Buster's Management Corporation, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Shannon Jarrett and Matthew Jarrett
Defendant:
Dave and Buster's Management Corporation, Inc. and Dave & Buster's of Pennsylvania, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00219
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BUSTER et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05205
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE BUSTER and LISA BUSTER
Defendant:
"XYZ CORP", MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., "JANE DOE" and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MCGLONE v. DAVE & BUSTERS
as 2:2016cv03035
Plaintiff:
DENISE MCGLONE
Defendant:
DAVE & BUSTERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HYNSON et al v. DAVE & BUSTER'S, INC.
as 2:2015cv05256
Plaintiff:
CHRYSTIE HYNSON and JORDYN GOMEZ
Defendant:
DAVE & BUSTER'S, INC.
Cross_claimant:
DAVE & BUSTER'S, INC.
Cross_defendant:
CHRYSTIE HYNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUSTER v. GAUDENZIA DRC, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03515
Plaintiff:
RICKY BUSTER
Defendant:
GAUDENZIA DRC, INC., PAT O'CONNER, BARBARA SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
