Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Brown v. Chatham County Public Defenders Office et al
as 4:2024cv00164
Defendant:
Chatham County Public Defenders Office, James Byrnes and Kelly Turner
Plaintiff:
James Clarence Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
Piedmont Healthcare, Inc. and University Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Byrne v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Valentine Byrne
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Byrne v. Aqua Terra Bistro, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03668
Plaintiff:
Brandy Byrne
Defendant:
Aqua Terra Bistro, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00232
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Taylor et al v. University Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
University Health Services, Inc. and Piedmont Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Richardson v. Morse et al
as 4:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Randal Lamar Richardson
Defendant:
John E. Morse, Timothy Walmsley, Shaleena Cook Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollowell v. Byrne
as 1:2022cv01832
Petitioner:
JoVon Montell Hollowell
Respondent:
David Byrne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horvath v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv01413
Petitioner:
Alexander Horvath
Respondent:
Anthony Blinken, Merrick Garland, Michael S. Yeager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.