Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Brown v. Vulcan LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01408
Plaintiff:
Byron Brown
Defendant:
Vulcan LLC, Vulcan Sports & Entertainment LLC, Landmark Event Staffing Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JAMES-IRVIN v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv01961
Plaintiff:
KEITA M JAMES-IRVIN and KEITA M. JAMES-IRVIN
Defendant:
1017 Records, STACY ABRAMS, ASCAP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Johnson et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv00946
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson and 101 Hands On
Defendant:
Linda Hesch, Quality Assurance & Monitoring Unit, The State Education Department The University of the State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18634
Plaintiff:
BYRON BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nesa v. City of Buffalo et al.,
as 1:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Mujibun Nesa
Defendant:
City of Buffalo, Byron Brown, James Comerford, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. NICS
as 22-1485
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
NICS, CJIS, Buffalo Police Department and others
Eckert v. City of Buffalo et al
as 1:2022cv00540
Plaintiff:
Rachel Eckert
Defendant:
City of Buffalo, County of Erie, State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. NICS, et al
as 5:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
NICS, CJIS, Buffalo Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lomack v. Brown et al
as 6:2021cv06558
Plaintiff:
Taiwan D. Lomack
Defendant:
Mayor Byron Brown, Sheriff Timothy B. Howard, Superintendent Thomas Duna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
