Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Turner v. County of Lycoming et al
as 4:2023cv02161
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lee Turner
Defendant:
County of Lycoming, Lycoming County Prison, Brad A. Shoemaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Lycoming County Prison et al
as 1:2021cv00781
Defendant:
Nate Edler, Chase Willard, Lt. Harry Entz and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lattimore v. Shoemaker et al
as 1:2020cv00987
Defendant:
Christopher J. Ebner, Brad A. Shoemaker and Ryan C. Barnes
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Lattimore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARNER et al v. SWEPI, LP et al
as 1:2019cv00326
Plaintiff:
RICHARD W. ZINK, JOHN L. STEWART, GILDA GIANCOLA and others
Defendant:
SWEPI, LP and SHELL ENERGY HOLDING GP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Friend v. Shoemaker et al
as 3:2018cv01715
Defendant:
Brad Shoemaker, Tony R. Mussare, R. Jack McKernan and others
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Ibn Jihad Friend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. An Unknown Named Number of NSA Agents et al
as 1:2013cv02062
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
An Unknown Named Number of NSA Agents, At Least four FCC Forrest City unknown named Agents of the bop operating from the special housing Unit, An Unknown Named Number of Other United States Government Agents and others
Amicu:
Nancy-Ann E. DeParle
Fifth_party_defendant:
Mona K. Sutphen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BARNES, SR. v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31032
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. BARNES, SR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BARNES v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 2:2010cv78961
Plaintiff:
LARRY C BARNES
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
