Cases 1 - 10 of 17
GRAY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
HERBERT GRAY
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, ESQ., PATRICIA MCGILL, MARC SIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INSELBERG et al v. BROOK & ASSOCIATES, PLLP et al
as 2:2020cv10789
Defendant:
CLINTON BROOK & PEED, BROOK & ASSOCIATES, PLLC, BRIAN C BROOK and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC INSELBERG and INSELBERG INTERACTIVE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Fosamax
as 14-2633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANN B. BROOKS and WILTON C. BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC
Brooks et al v. Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp
as 3:2013cv04047
Plaintiff:
Ann B Brooks and Wilton C Brooks, Jr
Defendant:
Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROOKS et al v. MON RIVER TOWING, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv01580
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS C. BROOKS and KELCI L. BROOKS
Defendant:
MON RIVER TOWING, INC. , CONSOL ENERGY SALES COMPANY and CONSOL ENERGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BROOKS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56400
Plaintiff:
ANDREW C. BROOKS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BROOKS et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv37301
Plaintiff:
EDWARD C. BROOKS, JR. , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BROOKS v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70545
Plaintiff:
EDWARD C. BROOKS, JR.
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROOKS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv39054
Plaintiff:
WALLACE C. BROOKS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BROOKS v. ASTRUE
as 2:2010cv00658
Plaintiff:
JERRY C. BROOKS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
