Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Curry v. Reyes et al
as 5:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Tony C. Curry
Defendant:
Ricky J. Reyes, Quaja Goodman, James Montford Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Axis Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv05337
Plaintiff:
Guy C. Curry
Defendant:
Omni Hotels Management Corporation, Royal O Real Estate Holdings, LLC and Axis Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Knox v. Rivers et al
as 3:2019cv00200
Defendant:
Warden Mr. Rivers, Unit Manager Mr. N. Bullock, Case Manager Ms. V. Hawkins and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Byron Joseph Knox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diaz v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv00839
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Melvin Alexander Diaz
Defendant:
SIS Tech C. Clark, Unit Manager, D-1 A. Smith and Unit Manager C. Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Blackman et al
as 3:2016cv00752
Plaintiff:
Jesse Jackson
Defendant:
B.E. Blackman, C. Curry, Director of B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America v. Hub Mechanical Contractors, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00101
Plaintiff:
Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America
Defendant:
Hub Mechanical Contractors, Inc., Carreme B. Curry, George C. Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Padilla v. Currie et al
as 6:2013cv00121
Defendant:
Eddie Baker, C Currie, Director Brad Livingston and others
Plaintiff:
Ismael H Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Padilla v. Currie et al
as 3:2013cv01360
Plaintiff:
Ismael H Padilla
Defendant:
C Currie, Eddie Baker, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. James Curry
as 11-30329
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES C CURRY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
