Cases 1 - 10 of 21
WILLIAMS v. SPAGEL et al
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD SPAGEL, OFFICER PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. EISAI, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv01597
Plaintiff:
LINDA C. CLARK
Defendant:
EISAI, INC., EISAI CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA and EISAI CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBINSON v. HOLMAN et al
as 1:2017cv00274
Plaintiff:
KYLE SCOTTLEE ROBINSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL HOLMAN, C. WILLIAMS, C. CLARKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2015cv04276
Plaintiff:
SAUNDRA C. CLARK
Defendant:
STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LAKE AT LAS VEGAS JOINT VENTURE, LLC, et al., et al v. 820 MANAGEMENT TRUST et al
as 2:2012mc00079
Plaintiff:
LARRY LATTIG and LLV-1, LLC
Defendant:
820 MANAGEMENT TRUST, ALPINE CASCADE CORPORATION, LEE M. BASS and others
Movant:
TOLL BROTHERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
CLARK et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67513
Plaintiff:
WALTER C. CLARK and EILEEN D. CLARK
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv66710
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLARK and OCIE C. CLARK
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., SOUTHERN TEXTILE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv07273
Plaintiff:
MARY C. CLARK
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LITTLEJOHN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv06996
Plaintiff:
KEICA LITTLEJOHN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , C. CLARK, REED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
