Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Dorazio v. Reyes et al
as 3:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
William Dorazio
Defendant:
Erin Reyes, C. Dieter, Dr. Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roosevelt Smith v. Cell Search Team, et al
as 24-11006
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT SMITH
Defendant:
CELL SEARCH TEAM, DALE VAUGHN, BOBBY J. GREEN and others
Leo Farnsworth v. Glenn Youngkin
as 24-6273
Plaintiff:
LEO BRANDON FARNSWORTH
Defendant:
GLENN YOUNGKIN, TERRANCE C. COLE, CHADWICK DOTSON and others
Patterson v. Youngkin et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Larry Edwin Patterson
Defendant:
Glenn Youngkin, Terrance C. Coles, Patricia West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Running v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2023cv00913
Plaintiff:
Christy Running
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Sarah Walker, C. Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Cole
as 5:2023cv00489
Petitioner:
Bryan Ross
Respondent:
Warden D. C. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Cole
as 5:2023cv00463
Petitioner:
Joseph Macastle Jackson
Respondent:
D. C. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Daniel Cobb v. Catricia Howard, et al
as 23-15567
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL COBB
Defendant / Appellee:
CATRICIA HOWARD, Complex warden at USP-Tucson, K WERNER, SOMP Coordinator/ Psychologist at USP-Tucson, L UNRUH-PARKER, SOMP Psychologist at USP-Tucson and others
Morgan v. Boger et al
as 5:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Morgan, Jr
Defendant:
Michael Boger, C Cole, M Disney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Cell Search Team et al
as 2:2022cv14421
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Shavon Smith, III
Defendant:
Cell Search Team, Dale Vaughn, Bobby J. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
