Cases 11 - 20 of 21
A3 Energy et al v. County of Douglas et al
as 3:2011cv00875
Plaintiff:
A3 Energy and Gregg Nelson
Defendant:
City of Refuge, County of Douglas, David Gamble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rice v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv05923
Plaintiff:
Shane C. Rice
Defendant:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. and Sport and Fitness Clubs of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rice v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv05923
Plaintiff:
Shane C. Rice
Defendant:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. and Sport and Fitness Clubs of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv01808
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America, San Diego, County of, David J. Danielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv04242
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Christopher Johnson v. USDC-CAN
as 08-73802
:
In re: CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
EVANS, Warden, JERRY BROWN and C. RICE
Rose v. Rice et al
as 6:2008cv06276
Plaintiff:
Bill Rose
Defendant:
Richard C. Rice and Jill A. Rice
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Johnson v. Evans et al
as 3:2007cv06000
Petitioner:
Christopher Johnson
Respondent:
Evans, Jerry Brown and C. Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Evans et al
as 3:2007cv05973
Petitioner:
Christopher Johnson
Defendant:
Evans, J. Brown and C. Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
