Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Thorne v. Cryder et al
as 4:2019cv01217
Plaintiff:
Eugene C. Thorne, Jr.
Defendant:
C.O. Cryder and C.O. Hammer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorne v. Hammer et al
as 3:2017cv00939
Plaintiff:
Eugene C. Thorne, Jr.
Defendant:
Hammer and Cryder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenard Thorne v. South Central Correctional Fa, et al
as 15-5382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENARD C. THORNE
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CENTRAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, "SCCF", MICHAEL PARRISH and DANIEL PRITCHARD
Defendant:
BRENDA PEVAHOUSE and HANK INMAN
Glenard Thorne v. Jerry Lester
as 14-6214
Petitioner - Appellant:
GLENARD C. THORNE
Respondent - Appellee:
JERRY LESTER, Warden
Thorne v. Lester
as 3:2014cv00695
Petitioner:
Glenard C. Thorne
Respondent:
Jerry Lester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thorne v. South Central Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2014cv00001
Plaintiff:
Glenard C. Thorne
Defendant:
South Central Correctional Facility, Michael Parrish, Brenda Pevahouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorne v. South Central Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2013cv02957
Plaintiff:
Glenard C. Thorne
Defendant:
South Central Correctional Facility, Michael Parrish, Brenda Pevahouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Stritehoff v. Kathleen Green
as 10-7701
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. STRITEHOFF
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden, ECI, MARY COOPER, Assistant Warden, ECI, V. ENNIS, ECI and others
Stritehoff v. Green et al
as 1:2009cv03003
Plaintiff:
James L. Stritehoff
Defendant:
Kathleen Green, Mary Cooper, V. Ennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenzie v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2007cv00393
Plaintiff:
Cornell Augustus McKenzie
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Tracy W. Johns, O. Barat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
