Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Vaca Correa v. Federal Express Corporation
as 5:2026cv02274
Plaintiff:
Cesar David Vaca Correa
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
(PC) Wilson v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2026cv07456
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
Rene Alvarez, K. Ttienken, A. Urban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv11189
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vaca v. HomeXpress Mortgage Corp., et al.
as 26-5576
Plaintiff:
JORGE ALBERTO VACA
Defendant:
HOMEXPRESS MORTGAGE CORP., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., UNKNOWN TRUST and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10621
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(PC) Der-Boghossian v. Zavala et al
as 1:2026cv06062
Plaintiff:
Shant Der-Boghossian
Defendant:
M. Zavala, A. Guillen, C. Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Der-Boghossian v. Zavala et al
as 1:2026at03004
Plaintiff:
Shant Der-Boghossian
Defendant:
M. Zavala, A. Guillen, C. Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04908
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02942
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02935
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
