Cases 1 - 10 of 119
Prescott (PS) v. Hicks et al
as 6:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Tiara Hicks, Debora A. Adams, Andrew C. Brazeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott v. Catoe
as 23-40245
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeffery Catoe, Warden, Coffield Unit, Matthew Barber, Regional Director, Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01685
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Williams v. The State of Mississippi
as 3:2021cv00127
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Randy C. Williams
Defendant:
The State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Simon et al
as 4:2020cv00077
Plaintiff:
Randy C. Williams
Defendant:
Lee Simon, Ricky Scott and Ms. Meeks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Prescott v. Catoe et al
as 4:2020cv00169
Defendant:
John Warren, Matthew Barber, Tim Wildman and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Simon et al
as 4:2020cv00031
Defendant:
Timothy Morris and Lee Simon
Plaintiff:
Randy C Williams and Randy C. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Williams v. Arbuthnot et al
as 5:2019cv00059
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Randy C. Williams
Defendant:
Supervisor Unknown Arbuthnot and Deputy Warden Unknown Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Weller et al
as 4:2017cv03905
Plaintiff:
Lawrence C. Williams
Defendant:
Calvin Weller, Curtis D. Bridges, Jr., Charles H. Landis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randy Williams v. M.T.C., Incorporated, et al
as 17-60831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY C. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
M.T.C., INCORPORATED, SUPERVISOR TRACEY ARBUTHNOT, WARDEN UNKNOWN JACKSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
