Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Distinctive Vacations, S.A. DE C.V. et al v. Premier Guest Services, LLC et al
as 0:2025cv61224
Plaintiff:
Distinctive Vacations, S.A. DE C.V., C.T.C. Cancun Travel Concepts S.A. DE C.V. and LT Brands, S.A. DE C.V.
Defendant:
Premier Guest Services, LLC and Cedar Creek International, Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Romero v. C.T.C. Cleaning Services LLC et al
as 2:2025cv00281
Plaintiff:
Rosalba Teran Romero
Defendant:
C.T.C. Cleaning Services LLC, Carlos Rafael Toro Covas, Unknown Covas and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McElroy v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2025cv00314
Defendant:
C.O. Galvan, Does 1-3 Inmate Appeals at CDCR Headquarters Level of Review Sacramento Div., Doe Director and Chief and others
Plaintiff:
Latwahn J. McElroy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Varillas et al v. C.T.C. Cleaning Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03017
Defendant:
Daisy Toro, Unknown Covas, C.T.C. Cleaning Services LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Espinoza, Irma Meza Perez, Argelia Rios Varillas and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Quintana v. C.T.C Cleaning Services LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01985
Plaintiff:
Isela Quintana
Defendant:
C.T.C Cleaning Services LLC, Carlos Toro and Unknown Toro
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ingles et al v. Salano et al
as 3:2010cv00926
Plaintiff:
Adam Ingles and Witnesses of Deprived Medical Inmates of Duval Jail, M.C.C, C.T.C.
Defendant:
FNU Salano, Nurse Baker and Staff Member's John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amador v. Pleasant Valley State Prison
as 1:2009cv00299
Plaintiff:
Jess J. Amador
Defendant:
C.T.C. Staff At Pleasant Valley State Prison
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moss v. Schwarzenegger, et al
as 08-4094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SPENCER MOSS
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor, H. HUANG, Doctor, FNU JANKOVICK, Doctor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
