Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Maldonado v. Lizarraga et al.
as 2:2015cv02436
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Shanee Maldonado
Defendant:
Joe Lizarraga, R. Davis, D. Ding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosales et al v. Dutschke et al
as 2:2015at00615
Plaintiff:
Walter Rosales , Karen Toggery , April Louise Palmer and others
Defendant:
Amy Dutschke, John Rydzik, Kenny Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rosales, et al. v. Dutschke, et al.
as 2:2015cv01145
Plaintiff:
Walter J. Rosales , Karen Toggery , April Louise Palmer and others
Defendant:
Amy Dutschke, John Rydzik, Kenneth Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
David Garbarino et al vs. Charles W. Poss et al
as 2:2015cv02865
Defendant:
C.W. Poss, Inc., Charles W. Poss, Charles W. Poss and others
Plaintiff:
David Garbarino and James Ryan
Davis v. Hoffman et al
as 2:2014cv00714
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Davis
Defendant:
C.W. Hoffman and Honorable Ruth Kolhoss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
C.W. Crosser Construction Inc v. Commercial Electric Inc et al
as 1:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
C.W. Crosser Construction Inc
Defendant:
Commercial Electric, Inc. and DOES
Counter_claimant:
Commercial Electric, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
C.W. Crosser Construction Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reed v. Chenega Operations Services, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00019
Plaintiff:
Ana Liza C.W. Reed
Defendant:
Chenega Operations Services, LLC and Chenega Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
C.W. Crosser Construction Inc v. Commercial Electric Inc et al
as 8:2013cv01233
Plaintiff:
C.W. Crosser Construction Inc
Defendant:
Commercial Electric Inc and Does
Bank v. Hoffman
as 2:2013cv00967
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Bank
Defendant:
C.W. Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
