Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rice v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv12482
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rice v. Davis et al
as 4:2018cv04037
Respondent:
Leisha Kizzee, Lorie Davis, Allen P Evans and others
Petitioner:
Calvin Rice
Defendant:
The Office of the Attorney General - Amicus Curiae
Amicus Curiae:
The Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05878
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY JONES , SHARON R. JONES , FURMAN KERR and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rice v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2013cv04940
Plaintiff:
Calvin Rice
Defendant:
Louisiana State
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reeves et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as ILS/3:13-cv-00675
Plaintiff:
Charles Reeves , Ruby Reeves , William B. Reeves and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Reeves et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2013cv00675
Plaintiff:
Charles Reeves , Ruby Reeves , William B. Reeves and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jones et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03170
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Jones , Sharon R. Jones , Furman Kerr and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rice v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 5:2008cv01054
Plaintiff:
Calvin Rice
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
