Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Etuk v. Camba Inc.
as 26-1611
Plaintiff:
AKANIYENE WILLIAM ETUK
Defendant:
CAMBA INC., ARROW SECURITY INC., CUMMBERBATCH and others
Kane v. Camba, Inc.
as 1:2026cv00270
Plaintiff:
Nickie Kane
Defendant:
Camba, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jimenez et al v. Camba Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv05625
Plaintiff:
Dennis Jimenez, Barbra Martinez and Edmund Skinner
Defendant:
Camba Inc. and CHV 560 Winthrop Street LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Carter v. Camba Housing Ventures, Inc.
as 25-1813
Plaintiff:
DARRYL C. CARTER
Defendant:
CAMBA HOUSING VENTURES, INC., SHINDA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, CAMBA, INC. and others
Milchamot v. Bronx County District Attorneys Office
as 25-410
Plaintiff:
YEHUDAH MILCHAMOT
Defendant:
BRONX COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, CAMBA, INC. and NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, in their individual & official capacities acting under color of state law
Etuk v. Camba, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv08698
Plaintiff:
Akaniyene William Etuk
Defendant:
Camba Inc., Arrow Security Inc., Miss Cummberbatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Milchamot v. Bronx District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2024cv09101
Defendant:
Bronx District Attorney's Office, The New York City Police Department and CAMBA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Yehudah Milchamot
Interested Party:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Etuk v. CAMBA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv08886
Defendant:
Animal Care Center & John Doe Partners, Kings County Hospital, Arrow Security, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Akaniyene William Etuk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hanna v. Camba Inc.
as 1:2024cv07338
Defendant:
Camba Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leroy E. Hanna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hanna v. Camba, Inc.
as 23-7366
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEROY E. HANNA
Defendant / Appellee:
CAMBA, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
